---begin intro to pathobiology--- INTRODUCTION TO PATHOBIOLOGY Dr Colin Johnstone 9.2.97 1 pm B101 Dr Johnstone is a parasitology teaching team member. Today is an overview of three presentations. Much of the material we hear today will be new. But, today is an introductory symposium, and everything we hear today will be repeated again later. VETERINARY EDUCATION three phases * animal biology - study of normal healthy animals. anatomy, physiology, histology, embryology, biochem * pathobiology - study of disease. study of causes and transmission of diseases as well as expression of dz process at cellular, tissue, organ levels. pathology, microbiology, parasitology * clinical studies - medicine, surgery, etc. pinnacle of pyramid. learn to diagnose disease in living animal. learn to acheive glory by learning how to tx and control various ailments pests and pestilences that afflict our animal companions. PATHOBIOLOGY interface between normal and sick animal. * pathology: general and systemic * microbiology: bacteria, viruses, fungi - etiology of diseases * parasitology: arthropods, protozoa, helminths each subject is taught separately but we must integrate them, as they are often linked in significant ways. there are three important examples of diseases we'll discuss * LYME DZ * BOVINE VIRAL DIARRHEA (BVD) * HEARTWORM LYME DISEASE: in 1975, an unusual cluster of cases of arthritis in kids occured in lyme, CT. it included other features, atypical of pediatric arthritis, like a circular rash, and a fever, and flulike symptoms. left untreated, dz progressed into chronic form affecting nervous system, heart, joints. cases were seasonal, onset in summer, peak in fall. clusters were suburban/urban. The seasonal onset with peak in summer/early fall is typical of arthropod associated dz. The tick ixodes scapularis was ultimately incriminated as the vector of this unidentified dz. in 1982, a new spirochete, borrelia burgdorferi, was isolated from ticks in the area of Lyme CT. a veterinary dimension to this dz was also discovered, which includes important links between parasit, pathology, and microbiology. Dr. Thomas Van Winkle will discuss the pathology of the disease affecting the dog "Spiro" Dr Schifferli will discuss how the pathogen was microbiologically isolated Dr Lok will explain how the tick functions as a vector, how parasites infect hosts and cause disease. PATHOLOGY of lyme disease: first, some reminders. pathology includes many aspects of study of disease. ETIOLOGY: cause of disease. PATHOGENESIS: series of steps occuring which lead to changes seen with disease. we're going to follow etiology through pathogenesis in this disease. in general path, we discussed cell injury, death, necrosis, etc. inflammation, hypersensitivity, repair, hemodymamic disorders, neoplasia, etc. these will all come up again every day for the next 40-60 years of our lives so you should know about them. biological agents seen in microbiology and parasitology cause the diseases we see the effects of in pathology. "SPIRO" 5 yr old male labrador. presented at VHUP with 5 wk hx anorexia, vomiting, lethargy, wt loss. was lame on LR leg sometimes in past 3 mos. was PU/PD. also had proteinuria and cellular casts in the urine. bloodwork: BUN and creat were both elevated, BUN 226, creat 12. Albumin was very low - 1.8 hypoproteinemia. PCV was also low. So we know there is a kidney function problem. The very low albumin accounted for the development of edema and ascites, which did occur during the hospitalization. Spiro wasn't eating or drinking. was put on IVs. got worse and worse. the owners elected euthanasia and agreed to a necropsy. so far, we know Spiro had a "protein losing nephropathy." The necropsy showed bilateral ulcers below the tongue, and uremic mineralization of the ribs. but the kidneys were worst. smooth, yellow-tan, approx normal size. histologically, we saw severe thickening of the glomeruli, largely dilated tubules with basophilic cells with large nuclear: cytoplasmic ratio - tubular necrosis and regeneration. inflammation in interstitium and tubular atrophy. severe membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis and something else i didn't see. now, they know they only have these two things at the same time in dogs from lyme endemic areas. clinical association with borreliosis: all dogs from lyme endemic areas 13 dogs had concurrent or recent lameness. 100% of dogs tested were positive for exposure. 6 of them had been vaccinated against lymes disease. what next? immunohistochemistry of kidney. stain for IgG shows a lumpy bumpy deposition of IgG. Stain for IgM shows a similar pattern (in the glomeruli). We know that Ig's are usually bound to Ag's, right? now if they form Ag/Ab complexes and deposit in the kidney, we get activated complement. So they stained for C3, and found lots of it in the glomerulus. the complement, you recall, draws in neutrophils which can do a lot of damage.... so now the glomerulus is damaged, albumin is lost into the urine. we also used histochemical technique to find spirochetes in some of the kidneys. remember there are glomerular and tubular lesions. what causes the tubular lesions? maybe the spirochetes. Now, a paper was studied on the epidemiological data and histopathological data. we know that the spirochetes are found in the kidneys. we know that if you give this spirochete to the dog you will get lameness and arthritis. the epidemiological data is good. one other thing was done - they know there is Ab bound to Ag there. What if they can isolate the Ab and see what Ag it is bound to? So they pulled the Ab off the glomeruli, and found that they are in fact directed against borrelia burgdorferi. So that's good correlative evidence. That's how they figured out that b.burgdorferi is causing these problems. Now: MICROBIOLOGY takes over: Dieter Schifferle (Swiss guy). STAGES of lyme dz Early: localized signs: erythema migrans disseminated symptoms: skin, musculoskeletal, NS, lymphadenopathy, heart, eyes, liver, respiratory, genitourinary Late: persistent: chronic arthritis, late neuralgic involvement, acrodermatitis Spriochetosis! This was described in 1982 when Swiss scientist willy burgdorfer identified a borrelia from ticks - b.burgdorferi transmission cycle: vextor==ixodes ticks. reservoir== mice, deer, birds, lizards, zoonotic cycle==cessential what are spirochetes? * bacteria -cellular organisms with ribosomes and are susceptible to antibiotics. NOT viruses. -prokaryotes - NOT eukaryotes like fungi, parasites, algae, plants, animals bacteria have a nuclear membrane, cell wall, peptidoglycans, different types of ribosomes, etc bacteria come in many forms. they are larger than viruses, can see them with light microscope. can form cocci spheres, rods==baccili, fusilliform, filament, etc etc or spiral/coiled spirochetes. SPIROCHETES are slender, flexible, helicoidal motile bacteria. slender, hard to grow, fastidious, require special things to grow. syphyllis, leptospirosis caused by spirochetes. they have two types of membranes. an inner cytoplasmic membrane and an outer membrane. in between is the periplasm, and you have a flagellum located in the periplasm. the flagellum has a motor that makes it turn, and the spirochete will spin and can move in a corkscrew fashion through a viscous medium. NEW OR OLD DISEASE? well, in europe, symptoms were described as early as 1888 - called erythema chronica migrans. 2000 cases/yr in switzerland. in North america, they found the spirochete in museum ticks from the 1940s. in the NE states, there was abandonment of farms, reforestation, increased deer population, proximity of suburban population...lyme is the most common vector borne dz in the USA. it's a worldwide dz - russia, china, japan, australia, europe. geographical variations: relative occurence of late symptoms: in america, more arthritis. in europe, more neuro and skin manifestations, why? phenotypic/genotypic heterogeneity of bacterial isolates. use of serotyping, plasmid profiles, RFLP, MLEE, ribotyping - shows that the spirochetes are actually different species. in USA we have b. burgorferi and garinii. but there is also andersonii and japonica and afzelii. all cause disease. bacterial pathogenesis: by using a vector, b burgdorferi can bypass host surface adhesion and colonization steps. it evades host defenses by covering itself with host proteins and hiding in closed compartments. many borrelia may be killed by host defenses but enough can hide in joints, kidneys, etc to cause dz. surface exposed lipoproteins are the first molecules to interact with host molecules. these are very important molecules. some have been used in vaccine development. some vaccines seem to work in beagles, but not sure about other dogs. b.burgdorferi persists in the host despite a strong Ab response. there is differential expression in host/vector of the surface exposed lipoproteins. some are expressed only in certain compartments of host or tick. antigenic variation by recombination betwen an expression locus and a silent locus. antigenic variation occurs within a single host. you have genes which express a certain protein, and other genes which are silent, but may be exchanged with the first genes. so it is hard to know what Ag to use to make vaccine. the genome of borrellia is special, atypical of bacteria. there is a linear chromosome, a couple small circular plasmids, and a couple more small linear plasmids. now, there may be essential genes on these plasmids, so maybe they are actually chromosomes...but that's another story. so, you have a relapsing/remitting fever disease which is better studied than lyme disease. in that dz, the agent enters host, makes Ag, host makes Ab, gets better. then spirochete makes 2nd Ag, animal gets sick again, host makes Ab, gets better. etc etc - relapsing/remitting. B. Burgdorferi causes disease by being an invasive organism. no toxin produced. it binds host plasminogen, which gets activated to plasmin, allowing the pathogen to disseminate by digesting extracellular matrix proteins. plasmin digests ECM proteins, see. migration seems more efficient than bloodborne spread. in blood, spirochetes are susceptible to macrophage killing. But the spirochete can hide from mphage. also spirochete induces an inflammatory repsonse, damaging the host. neutrophils migrate due to bacterial invasion of endothelial cells and activation of adhesion mols, and bacterial induction of synovial linings to express IL8, chemotactic for neutrophils. ETIOLOGIC DIAGNOSIS: find out if there is an infectious agent involved. why? optimal preentive and therapeutic measures How? Henle-Koch's postulates. 1883. to recognize an organism as the etiologic agent of dz: pathogen should be present in all cases of dz must be isolated in pure culture should be able to reproduce the dz diagnostic tools: for lyme, very difficult. hard to isolate the agent, long halflife, hard to get from host because is in low concentration. cultivation: low concentration in clinical specimens, long generation time, complex growth requirements, difficult growth on solid media serology: crossreactive ag, insensitive early in infxn, long lasting titers. western blot to confirm...but, problem with standardization due to crossreactive Ags. moreover, the agent itself doesn't cause a strong Ab response early in dz. when patients are suspected of having lyme, because they used to have lyme, it is hard to tell if they are having a recurrence or something else - because the titer persists for so long. PCR: genetic heterogeneity of isolates ---break---- so, we know that b.burgdorferi is causing lyme disease. but how is it getting into the host, and where does it hang out? PARASITOLOGY: life cycle of the vector we've heard the term vector used already - but what does it mean? vector == transmitter. an animal which carries an etiological agent from a donor to a host in a directed fashion. movement of the etiological agent from vector to host comes about due to specific behavior patterns. the vector here turned out to be a group of ticks which have a combined geographic range almost identical to the range of the disease itself. ixodes scapularis is a tick, an arthropod related to spiders, scorpions. ticks pass through a series of life stages, each punctuated by a meal of vertebrate blood. during its life cycle, a tick may parasitize more than one host. eg, rabbits and cows, at different stages of life cycle. so the tick can move pathogens frmo one animal reservoir into another animal host. and this is what happens with b.burgdorferi ticks can act in this way because of a specific relationship with vertebrate hosts. ticks are parasites. a parasite == an organism which lives temprorily on or in another living organism (plant or animal host) for the purpose of obtaining nourishment. ticks are ectoparasites: live on surface of host, skin, haircoat, feathers. endoparasites live within the host's body. parasitology==science that deals with the interactions between an individual host and its population of parasites as well as the interactions of host populations and the parasites that infect them. parasitology limits itself to the study of eukaryotic organisms...protozoans, helminths, and arthropods. examples: single celled eukaryotes: protozoa eg trypanosomes which live in blood helminths eg worms, eg flukes (platyhelminthes) tapeworms (also platyhelminthes) nematodes (roundworms aka ascarids) also include some arthropods eg fleas, ticks, mites some parasites like the screwworm depend totally on vertebrate host - can never free live outside of the host. other parasites like a related fly larva, the wool maggot of sheep - can live outside of hte host in a free living situation. within individual parasite lifestyles, parasites move from freeliving stages to obligatory endoparasite stages. so life cycles are important. much of the science of parasitology is organized around life cycles. parasitologists tend to be preoccupied with life cycles, justifiably so, because we're talking about the changes in form/number required for a parasite to complete its life cycle. back to Lyme Disease and ixodes scapularis. the ticks start out as a larva hatching from an egg on the ground. the larvae parasitize small mammals eg whitefooted mice, squirrels, chipmunks, and sometimes birds. the whitefooted mice are the primary enzootic reservoir for the spirochete pathogen. they do not become ill. so the larvae engorge on the blood of the mice, picking up the spirochete. they then drop off and molt to the nymphal stage. the nymphs are less host specific. they will feed on the small mammals OR dogs, horses, people, etc. So the spirochete can go into human/domestic animal populations at this point. the nymph, after feeding, will return to environment, molt to adult stage, which will parasitize mainly white-tailed deer, but sometimes also horses, dogs, and man. so the deer is another reservoir. one way in which life cycles are important for us...lets talk about other types of parasite lifecycles we'll see. protozoan life histories...sexual to asexual phases of the life cycle nematode life cycles...larval stage from egg, to adult stages in gut or tissue arthropods...simple metamorphosis as in sucking lice, or complete metamorphosis in fleas. flea is also a good reminder of how life cycle may encompass environment and host (larva and adult flea live in different places) by knowing some of the tissue trophisms of parasites as they go through their life histories, we can predict the pathologies they will cause in the animal host. ascaris suum will start migrating through liver during first few days in the host - and these pigs get "milkspot dz" - granulomatous response in the liver to the migrating ascaris suum larvae. another example: if we know that a female sarcoptic mange mite lives in torturous canals in the epidermis of the host ,and that thousands of them live on the host, it isn't surprising to realize that mange will occur with awful skin reactions - because we know the mites are digging up the skin. we can also generalize re: epidemiology of vector borne and parasitic dz by knowing about life cycle. eg, margins of wooded areas, border between meadow and woods are typical areas where people get infected. when you are confronted with a life cycle like ixodes scapularis, it is kind of daunting to learn. we will become more and more convinced of this as we get into the course. what will help us? well, try to distill the life cycle down to a few points. 1. how does host acquire the infection? for lyme dz, host goes through wooded region and picks up a tick, which feeds on it. 2. what is predilection site and how does parasite get there? for ixodes, it's the skin/integument of host and it gets there by falling onto it or something 3. how does parasite get back to environment or to intermediate host? for ixodes, it just lets go of the skin and falls off. 4. what life stages are involved in entering and leaving the primary host? usually the nymphal stage nails us, although adult can be infective as well. relationship of parasitism to disease. in parasitism, infection !=disease. it isn't the same thing. some organisms, eg protozoa, eg say plasmodium, can self replicate in the host, and one infective stage can theoretically result in fulminant infection and disease. other organisms eg most nematodes do not self replicate in the host, and the presence and severity of clinical illness will be proportional to the infection pressure. parasitism is common in healthy animals. --- BOVINE VIRAL DIARRHEA: BVD Dr Perry Habecker, pathology Dr Leonard Bello, microbiology historical perspective: march 1946. new transmissible dz in cattle reported in USA. first case in a 4yr old red devon cow imported from UK. cow had watery diarrhea, fever, loss of milk production, anorexia. dx dysentery, treated symptomatically. well, she died overnight, and because she was a pet she was buried in the yard w/o necropsy. but we knew she probably ddin't have dysentery. during next ten days, 5 other animals got sick. they also had mouth ulcers, leukopenia, and abortions. in these outbreaks, the same field service clinicians from cornell visited the affected farms about five days before the outbreak, and after treating the original sick cow. so it seemed certain to be a viral disease, adn was called virus diarrhea. in 1953 a second apparently new dz of cattle was reported from iowa. it was different from the NY cases because of low morbidity and high mortality, and because of mucosal ulcers present throughout gut in 1956, in indiana, a disease was reported with same signs as ithaca outbreak, but also laminitis and lameness all three disease ultimately found to be caused by same virus, and the disease came to be called BVD. the agent is called BVDvirus, BVDV. since then, we've found that this virus is ubiquitous in cattle population. 70% of us cattle are seropositive. in 1960s virus was grown in culture and vaccines made. two biotypes were found: cytopathic and noncytopathic. the cytopathic type caused vacuolation and cell death when grown in culture. note that this has nothing to do with ability to cause disease. both biotypes can cause disease. in 1970s- vertical transmission was recognized. transmitted in utero. this led to a very significant discovery, which was that infection of a fetus in utero with a noncytopathic biotype during first 120-130 days of gestation, results in a calf which is immunotolerant and becomes infected. the virus continues to replicate in the tissues of these animals, and is shed into the environment all the time. immunotolerance, PI animals- persistently infected animals. this is because the fetal immune system is not fully formed at this stage of development. so this noncytopathic biotype is important in that it creates PI animals. two conclusions: one, the ability to produce PIs in animals means the noncytopathic biotype is predominant type in nature. also, re: controlling BVD, the key is to prevent fetal infecttions with noncytopathic biotype. PI cattle are the main reservoir of the infection. [some statistics about biotypes i'm not writing down. hey, he said we didn't have to take notes on this anyway...] mucosal dz: one of most severe forms of BVD, whether acute or chronic, it is invariably fatal. it only occurs in immunotolerant PI animals who have PI infections with noncytopathic biotype. when these animals become infected with the cytopathic biotype, they get mucosal disease. so for mucosal dz to occur, animal must be infected with BOTH biotypes, and it is the cytopathic type which causes the disease. how? well. immune system of PI animal doesn't recognize the cytopathic biotype as foreign, and doesn't mount an immune response, and gets sick and dies. the superinfective cytopathic biotype usually arises from a mutation of the cytopathic biotype already present in the animal. the mutation doesn't affect the antigenicity of the virus. so the biotype changes, but the antigenicity doesn't change. ---break--- now we launch into a description of pathological manifestations of BVD BVD is very complicated etiopathogenesis not fully understood. virus needs to infect fetuses. at certain times, fetus will die. or can be persistently infected. or can be born with an Ab titer. after day 125, fetus is immunocompetent. after that time, can get abortions, PI animals, or normal calves with Ab. it is the PI animals which are infecting other animals. they usually die of mucosal dz by age two. MUCOSAL DZ ulcerative and erosive oronasal lesions mucopurulent rhinitis ulcerohemorrhagic enterocolitis cystic colitis lymphocyte necrosis etc etc cow doctors will examine the mouths of sick bovids carefully. an erosive gingivitis may be seen. mouth may be full of erosions...may be seen on hard palate. slide: hyperemic tissue in cow mouth. tongue may be affected. slide: diphtheritic membrane forming over necrotic peyers' patch in SI. the virus kills the lymphocytes in the patches. the whole thing will collapse. this is due to cytopathic effects of the virus. mucosal dz is a rapidly evolving dz. animals die w/in 3-5 days (unless you euthanize them). sometimes they will go on chronically, with ulcers throughout GI tract, and also skin changes at feet, interdigital area, wasting away, intermittent diarrhea, crusting at eyes, nose. crusting dermatitis in inguinal region, on teats, etc. thrombocytopenia: 15 of 146 bvd cases at cornell had severe thrombocytopenia, counts 2000-33000. all had bleeding problems. concurrent neutropenia and lymphopenia. 6 of the 15 survived. this form of BVD is due to a new type of virus- BVD type II, that doesn't require the PI state to inflict damage. fetal mummification/fetal wastage. fetus dies in utero BVDV is also a teratogen. can cause cerebellar hypoplasia, microencephaly, hydranencephaly, optic nerve hypoplasia, retinal dysplasia, cataract, etc etc. any congenitally deformed bovine is a likely BVD victim. BVD causes mild immune deficiency. May see secondary bovine pasteurellosis pneumonia with BVD as underlying cause. lab tests: virus neutralization - least useful. if you find Ab you don't know if they're related to vaccine or mild infection or what. gold standard is viral isolation. time consuming and labor intensive. takes a few weeks. samples of blood or d/c swabs from live animals, or lymphocyte rich tissue or lung, kidney from necropsy. the immunoperoxidase monolayer assay is popular now. results in five days. --change speaker-- now that we've seen all this stuff, we probably want to know more about the virus, right? we know that Dr Schifferle is not from Brooklyn, and that bacteria are not viruses from our other lecture. Now we find out that viruses are not bacteria. so what are they? WHAT IS A VIRUS? well, a virus is a noncellular infectous agent containing * nucleic acid (RNA or DNA but not both) * protein (to protect nucleic acid, maybe also to contain attachment sites) * lipid envelope (optional - also contains attachment sites) nucleic acid will be encased in protein coat, or "capsid", together this is called a nucleocapsid. the smallest unit of the nucleocapsid is a capsomere. viruses are small. you can't see them with a light microscope at all. you need an electron microscope. they're about the size of ribosomes. there is a size range. vaccinia virus is much larger than most other viruses. poliovirus is pretty small. viruses are classified into different families. they are either RNA or DNA viruses, and they are naked or enveloped, and they are single stranded or double stranded or circular nucleic acid type viruses, etc BVD single stranded RNA virus VIRAL REPLICATION 1. attachment (remember those attachment sites? they interact with receptors on host cells. this is critical) 2. penetration (often some kind of fusion event. virus must get into cell) 3. uncoating (virus strips down, disassembles.) 4. gene expression (critical. virus is going to hijack this cell's metabolism) a)synthesis of proteins needed for viral subunits (capsomeres) b)inhibition of host cell activities (variable) 5. synthesis of viral nucleic acid 6. assembly of capsomeres to form capsid around viral nucleic acid 7. release of virus from host cell (now infectious) PROPERTIES OF BVDV 1. contains envelope derived from internal membranes of the infected cell 2. does NOT inhibit host protein synthesis 3. two biotypes: a) noncytopathic NCP b) cytopathic CP 4. nucleic acid == RNA 5. positive strand, 12.3 Kb 6. genome contains one large ORF (open reading frame)(3898 codons) coding for one large polyprotein which is cleaved during synthesis into the ten mature polypeptides found in infected cells. BVD contains an mRNA molecule which is its genome, basically. [he's going on about the synthesis in the cell of the virus. i'm not writing it down...] the virus gets into the cell by receptor mediated endocytosis. enters endosome, fuses with membrane to get out into cytoplasm of cell, where it uncoats, etc etc. virus buds into intracellular vesicles and is transported to cell surface, where the vesicle fuses with plasma membrane, releasing viral particles. this is not killing the cell. it's just making it into a virus factory. NCP biotype has no effect on tissue culture, but CP biotype kills cells in culture. p80 is associated only with CP strain. both strains are pathogenic in cattle. only NCP strain causes persistent infection, and both are involved in mucosal dz. how do the NCP and CP biotypes different, and how were they generated? the original NCP strain has had insertions into the p125 coding region, which create a new cleavage site (6) and formation of p80. this forms the CP biotype. so the NCP and cp strains are antigenically identical. immunotolerance to a specific NCP strain will result in immunotolerance to the homologous CP strain as well. Note that PI animals are not tolerant to DIFFERENT strains of BVD virus. p80 is ALWAYS found in the CP strain. you do not see CP without a p80, and you do not see p80 in NCP strain. no new epitopes are formed with this mutation. pregnant bovid...infected with NCP BVDV...fetus becomes PI with NCP and becomes constant source of infection to herd.....NCP mutates to CP, gets mucosal dz type II bvdv...regular immunocompetent cow can get severe often fatal dz. low crossreactivity with type I. we're not sure how these strains differ yet. --- CAL heartworm thing w/dr hendricks. this is ELVIS. you should be able to find it in the computer lab. [she's taking us through this computer program now] it's a really good computer program. It's on all the computers in the lab under "elvis" and she's planning to put them on the web asap. ---end intro to pathobiology---